From: Richardson <richardson-decatur-al@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: ZDUTTON – Messy messages!
Date: 1999-06-29 15:16:56
Hello cousins, Whew! What a week! Work has been very busy--I've had a hard time sitting down long enough to send any e-mail, but I sure do have a lot to say! First of all, I've about decided I'm going to do what I should have done in the first place: turn the list over to the ROOTS-L server and get it automated. It seems no one in the group (least of all me) has a "complete and correct" (if there is indeed such a thing!) copy of the mailing list. We've outgrown our training pants, which is what I predicted might happen when I started the list. I feel that this will be the best thing for everyone; it will ensure that everyone will get all of the mail they want (and not miss anything important; sorry Eula and James and Judy and Charles and probably others, too) and stop receiving it when they don't want it anymore (I've noticed several names still on most everyone's lists that actually asked "out" several months ago!) Also, all messages will be archived and available on the ROOTS-L web site. I'll be looking into all of this pretty soon. (By the way, for all of you missed my Homecoming message, I will resend it.) Now, to straighten out some confusion (I hope): ITEM #1: John Dutton the Elder, James Dutton of Walker County, and too many Thomas Duttons! When I first started researching the Duttons, the first thing I heard from all the older relatives was that there were "three" of them that came down from North Carolina--some said "three brothers", some said "three cousins", some said "three" not related at all. Even after I finally got a hold of Zachariah Dutton's will and showed them there were in fact more than three, some of them still say, "No, that's not right--there were three of them." The names of "the three", as told differently by different relatives, were either William, Johnny, and Tommy; or William, Edmund, and Tommy. Needless to say, until I did find Zachariah's will, I was pretty confused. In the very beginning, it was easy to believe that there were three. William Dutton we knew about. My Great-Grandfather Dan Dutton knew he was the grandson of William Dutton--Dan's father was James Zachary Dutton, and his father was William Dutton, "who came down from North Carolina." Granddaddy Dan was born, raised, and raised his own children in the house that William Dutton built; naturally, this part of his history was all around him. But in the years since the Duttons came to Alabama, the various groups of them had grown further and further apart; only the families of a handful had remained in the Danville area, where Dan Dutton spent his entire life. He was the sole survivor of the clan of William Dutton; aside from himself, he knew only of his close cousins in the families of Edmund Dutton and Thomas Dutton (both of whom he was almost old enough to remember). There were three. It was clear to him that his Grandfather William Dutton and Edmund Dutton were brothers, but the third, Thomas, didn't quite fit in. The name of John Dutton was nearly forgotten... Until I found him on the 1850 census--the first census I looked at, since I knew it was the earliest to include the names of the entire families. I was busy trying to connect "the three" I knew of--as brothers, cousins, or whatever--and I quickly learned that it wasn't quite that simple. In Morgan County, I found my William Dutton--a great bit older than I expected him to be--and next door to him, Thomas Dutton. Still a beginner at reading archaic script, I actually returned to the library several times to look up this one census record, totally unconvinced by what I seemed to have found--especially the ages of the people involved: 1850 Federal Census - Morgan County, Alabama - page 204B (stamped) - 14 Oct 1850 120-120 DUTTON, Thomas 41 M Farmer 400 NC I Elizabeth 32 F AL I John 72 M MD I Omah 60 F NC I George 13 M AL S Sarah 12 F AL S Mary F. 9 F AL S James H. 3 M AL 121-121 DUTTON, William 73 M Farmer 300 MD Mary 54 F TN Mary J. 16 F AL James 14 M AL HOGAN, William 10 M AL What confused me the most was the older couple, John and Omah Dutton, who seemed to be listed right in the middle of Thomas Dutton's household. It was customary for the census taker to list other relatives besides children--fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, etc.--at the end of the record, after the head of household's own children. So I was for a while uncertain if what I was seeing was correct: Thomas Dutton's parents. If Thomas Dutton's father was John Dutton, who was about the same age as William Dutton, it destroyed immediately the theory that it was as simple as "there were three brothers". But one thing was clear: William Dutton and John Dutton were brothers, and Thomas Dutton was the son of John Dutton. After several months of very successful research in Morgan County, I decided to "expand my search". I went to the library and looked up Duttons on the census in other counties of Alabama--and that's when I discovered James Dutton in Walker County. It excited me that he was born in North Carolina--and that he was close to the age of Thomas Dutton, who I knew to be the son of John Dutton. I was still very reluctant to declare he was a relative--but the evidence kept mounting up. By this time, I had traced back to Zachariah Dutton in North Carolina--and the next exciting piece of information about James Dutton of Walker County was this: living in the household with him was a man named Zachariah Dutton (who I soon determined to be the son of Jarrott Dutton, based on the research of Darlene Cole.) I now had a definite tie to my Dutton family--but more was to come. I discovered a marriage record in Lawrence County for a James Dutton to a Mary Irwin, dated 18 Jul 1832--about the time the James and Mary in Walker County would have been married--and to top it off, there was an Elizabeth Irwin living in the household with them in 1860! I soon found out that there was a great migration of families during the 1830's from Lawrence and Morgan Counties to the Walker County area--it seemed this James Dutton was a part of it. This migration also included a number of other families tied in with the Duttons in Morgan and Lawrence Counties--and then tied in again with James Dutton's family in Walker County: Kitchens, Sparks, Brown, and Irwin, to name a few. I was now firmly convinced that this James Dutton was a relative, but I wasn't exactly sure how until I sat down and thought about it. It was a simple proof. It was already all but proven that James Dutton of Walker County was a descendant of Zachariah Dutton; he was born in North Carolina at a time when Zachariah was the only Dutton in North Carolina, and he was married in Lawrence County, Alabama, at a time when only Zachariah's family was in the area. The only thing to determine was which of Zachariah's sons was his father. I made out a proof sheet much like this: Parents of James Dutton, born ca. 1807 in N.C.? 1. William - born ca. 1777 - married Mary Hogan ca. 1833 AL - couldn't be parents. 2. John - born ca. 1778 - married Omah Parrish in 1806 in NC - COULD be parents. 3. Zachariah Jr. - born ca. 1781? - nothing known - did not come to Ala. - probably not. 4. Alexander - born ca. 1784 - married Rachel Feazel in 1810 AL - couldn't be parents. 5. Jarrett - born ca. 1790 - married Charity McDaniel in 1820 AL - couldn't be parents. 6. Stephen - born ca. 1792 - married Sarah O'Briant in 1818 NC - couldn't be parents. 7. Edmund - born 1793 - married Margaret Barnett Ross in 1821 AL - couldn't be parents. 8. Samuel - born ca. 1797 - married Elizabeth Robinson Threadgill in 1822 NC - not a chance. 9. Matilda and Elizabeth - always the chance of illegitimate children, but unlikely, as neither came to Alabama (as far as I know). That doesn't leave many options open at all. Now, by no means is it PROVEN that John and Omah are the parents of James Dutton of Walker County, but it seems to fit the bill quite nicely, in a situation in which nothing else does. John Dutton had two sons on the 1810 N.C. census--presumably, Thomas and James. (Also a daughter, by the way, who hasn't been accounted for.) I'm convinced. Now, to the point where most researchers get confused (including me)--the OTHER Samuel Dutton in Lawrence County--where "the Thomas, son of Samuel" Eula's researcher friend was referring to comes from. After much time, research, and groaning on the subject, I decided that he doesn't fit in at all. He gets here too early, he leaves too early, and his children have no contact with any of Zachariah's descendants. Initially, (and quite naturally), we had assumed that he was Zachariah's son Samuel mentioned in his will, but that was before we found Samuel Sneed Dutton in Anson County, N.C. (ancestor of James and Judy), who has been proven to be Zachariah's son. Samuel Dutton in Lawrence County in fact did not come from North Carolina at all, or even Maryland--from the looks of it, Pennsylvania. This Samuel Dutton lived in Kentucky before he came to Alabama about 1818--he was married in Washington Co., Ky. on 5 Nov 1798 to Ellender Owens. His will and many estate and land records are on file in Lawrence County, Alabama, where he died in 1823, and he did in fact have a son named Thomas--it is this Thomas who we believe is the ancestor of our Sonya Mims here. But I've studied all of the estate records, and the following is very clear: Thomas Dutton, son of Samuel Dutton, was born ca. 1799 in Kentucky--NOT North Carolina; he married in Kentucky about 1818/19 to Mary Brooks--NOT Elizabeth Kitchens; he had one son, Thomas Jr., born ca. 1820/21 in Lawrence Co., Ala. (that would be 5 May 1821 if this is Sonya's ancestor--he died 18 Mar 1876 in Brady, Texas)--NOT the nine listed on the census with our Thomas, all very documented; and lastly, Thomas Dutton, Sr., son of Samuel Dutton of Lawrence County, died in his twenties, ca. 1827, leaving a vast fortune to his only son; his widow Mary remarried to Samuel White in 1829, who became guardian of her son Thomas Dutton Jr. -- while OUR Thomas Dutton, clearly the son of John Dutton and the brother of James, lived into his seventies, and was widely known and remembered by many. The following sketch, a little humorous, paints a portrait of "Tom" Dutton, a lovable, unforgettable old man. It appeared in The Alabama Enquirer (much later known as The Hartselle Enquirer, out of Hartselle, Morgan County, Ala.) on 12 Dec 1889: "MR. TOM DUTTON lived near Basham's Gap at the home of his father, who was a pioneer of the country. Tom was a good economist, and a successful man. He was a peculiar and eccentric man. Never was a member of the church, but once every year, he would get happy and shout at church. Many of you readers will call to mind how, often they have heard his sudden, shrill voice of rapture, just as the preacher was earnest in the preservation of a live sermon. How he would go to the pulpit, then along the pews and shake hands and call on all to help him praise the Lord. The old man has long ago crossed the river, and met under the "shade of the trees" his sainted wife who went before him." [Betty Dutton Woodworth, of our group, by the way, is a descendant of Thomas Dutton, through his daughter Mary Frances Dutton, who married her second cousin (actually, her father's first cousin) Stephen Penn Dutton, son of Edmund Dutton.] As far as the rumors of James Dutton of Walker County being "James Tommy Dutton", I've heard many of the same from a lot of different researchers. I find that unlikely. It seems to me that somewhere along the line, someone got confused. Having heard of both James Dutton and Tommy Dutton, but not being able to "explain" where the Tommy Dutton came from, the two were merged somehow; or someone just plain forgot. With very little written record of James Dutton for more than a hundred years, it would not be hard. James Dutton has no tombstone by which to remember him by; as far as I know, there was no family Bible; census records weren't readily available until the 1940's, at best, and weren't of much interest to most people anyway; and land records and estate records were few, as the Walker County Courthouse was burned a number of times during and after the Civil War--the ones that survived were a little sketchy, and again, pretty boring stuff to the common man. All people had to go on, as far as James Dutton was concerned, was oral tradition, which as we know, is easily distorted. Still, I'd be interested to hear what people have to say about "James Tommy Dutton". Oh, no--it looks as if I've written another book. Hope none of you are asleep. ITEM #2: The IRWIN Family, the IRWIN-BROWN-KITCHENS-DUTTON-SPARKS-etc. Connection, and Dizzy, Endless Spirals Eula, I'm so pleased to hear you got some information on the Irwin family. You have the names of Mary Irwin's parents? The past couple of months I've been working extremely hard at the Lawrence County Archives, trying to piece together this family, without much luck at at all. During one of my recent visits to Walker County, I had a revelation about this and a number of the other families connected to it and to the Duttons: they're all related to each other, in kind of an endless spiral. It makes me dizzy just thinking about it. Here's a brief sample: James Matlock KITCHENS married Sarah BROWN. Thomas BROWN, the brother of Sarah BROWN, married Lovey IRWIN. Mary IRWIN, (who is suspect may be) the sister of Lovey IRWIN, married James DUTTON. Thomas DUTTON, the brother of James DUTTON, married Elizabeth KITCHENS, the daughter of James Matlock KITCHENS. Care for some more? There's plenty of it, and it gets deeper: Mary "Polly" KITCHENS, the sister of Elizabeth KITCHENS and the daughter of James Matlock KITCHENS, married Harvey William HAMILTON. Christopher Columbus HAMILTON, their son, married Elizabeth Ann DUTTON, the son of James DUTTON and Mary IRWIN. Thomas F. DUTTON, brother of Elizabeth Ann DUTTON and son of James DUTTON and Mary IRWIN, married Louisa E. CARMICHAEL, whose father was Francis Marion CARMICHAEL and whose mother was Sarah HAMILTON, the daughter of Harvey William HAMILTON and Mary "Polly" KITCHENS. Frances KITCHENS, the sister of Elizabeth KITCHENS and Mary "Polly" KITCHENS, married Samuel SPARKS. Elijah SPARKS, the brother of Samuel SPARKS, married Elizabeth BROWN, the daughter of Thomas BROWN (brother of Sarah BROWN, who married James Matlock KITCHENS) and Lovey IRWIN. William SPARKS, the brother of Samuel and Elijah SPARKS, married Eliza Elvira HOGAN, the daughter of Richard HOGAN and Rachel KELSO. Mary Hogan, the brother of Richard HOGAN, married William DUTTON, the brother of John DUTTON, who was the father of Thomas DUTTON who married Elizabeth KITCHENS and James Dutton who married Mary IRWIN. Are you dizzy yet? Anyway, all the families in the area of Morgan and Lawrence Counties, and even more so in Walker County, are related and inter-related and inter-woven, and it's a mess-- although, a very fun mess-- to untangle. I would be very happy to hear what you have found on the IRWIN family, Eula; perhaps I can either prove or disprove some of my endless assumptions and speculations. Also, along this same line: I believe the BROWN family which keeps fitting in here is the very same Brown family from which Margaret's John B. BROWN (who married Mary DUTTON, daughter of Jarrett) descends. In John Dombhart's HISTORY OF WALKER COUNTY, ALA., it is stated that Sarah BROWN, who married James Matlock KITCHENS, had at least two siblings: Thomas BROWN who married Lovey IRWIN, and Frances BROWN who married John Daniel RANDOLPH. I will call this "Group 1". In the book ITAWAMBA SETTLERS, an article on the BROWN family which Margaret sent me states that John B. BROWN had at least three siblings: William BROWN (who the article was actually about), who by the way married a Sarah KITCHENS, perhaps a sister (or maybe a niece) of James Matlock KITCHENS; LaFayette BROWN, and Ellen BROWN, who married Alex IRWIN (spelled ERWIN here, but it's all the same.) Ah, the plot thickens... This is "Group 2" -- but they may actually be one and the same. I looked up BROWN at the Lawrence County Archives, and found a lot more than I could deal with; still, there are a lot of apparent connections. I found a Samuel BROWN who married in 1825 to a Hannah ALLEY--the bondsman was Barton HAMILTON (am I right in assuming the father of Harvey William HAMILTON?), and the marriage was performed by James KITCHENS. There is also a Levi BROWN on the census in Itawamba Co., Miss. close to William BROWN, who ought to be a brother of that group. "Group 3" is a group of BROWNS closely related to the Samuel IRWIN family (the one branch of the IRWIN family I've managed to document). Samuel BROWN, born 12 Aug 1771, died 31 Jan 1848, very well could be the father or grandfather of all of the BROWNs I just mentioned above. He, and many relatives of both the Brown and Irwin families, are buried in the Brown Cemetery in Moulton, Lawrence County, Alabama. Okay, okay, I've think I've written enough for one day. But one more thing... :) ITEM #3: The Search for Stephen Penn Dutton Continues As most of you know, Betty Woodworth is descended from Stephen Penn Dutton, born Oct 1834, the son of Edmund Dutton. He, his 2nd wife, and a number of children moved ca. 1881 from Morgan County, Alabama to Wise County, Texas. There are six children of Stephen and his 1st wife, Mary Frances, listed on the census in Morgan County: (1) George, born ca. 1864, (2) Martin Luther, born ca. 1866, (3) Margaret E. born. ca. 1868, (4) John C., born 1870, (5) James A., born 1873, and (6) William W. Dutton, born ca. 1875. Mary Frances died in 1877, and in 1878 Stephen remarried to her sister, Mrs. Sarah Jane (Dutton) Witt-Turrentine (as I said above, Mary Frances and Sarah Jane were the daughters of Thomas Dutton and Elizabeth Kitchens.) Stephen and Sarah are listed on the 1880 census in Morgan County, presumably a short time before they left for Texas. Between the 1870 and 1880 censuses, one child, the oldest, George, disappears from the census; it is assumed that he died young. The others, though, should have gone with their father to Texas--but nothing is known of any of them except James Arthur, who is Betty Woodworth's great-grandfather. It is only he that appears on the 1900 Texas census with his father. Also, Sarah Jane had a son from her 2nd marriage to Mr. Richard J. Turrentine: Stephen Henry Turrentine, born ca. 1867; I assume he would have gone to Texas also. Stephen and Sarah Dutton had one child together, also: Mary L. Dutton, born Sep 1881 in Arkansas, according to the 1900 census. Stephen Penn Dutton went to Texas with his brother, Alexander D. Dutton, and sister, Margaret Elizabeth (DUTTON) Hughes, who married George S. Hughes (they are the ancestors of Janice Roper and Charles van Bebber). George and Margaret Hughes are buried in the Cottondale Cemetery in Wise County, Texas. Since we met, Woody and Betty Woodworth and I have been frantically trying to find the grave sites of Stephen Penn Dutton and his family, and Alexander D. Dutton and his family. Stephen Penn Dutton appears on the 1910 census soundex in Parker County, Texas, living with a Witt family (Sarah Jane Dutton's 1st husband was a Witt). Unfortunately, I don't have access to the complete 1910 Parker County Census, so that's all I know. James Arthur Dutton had moved to Oklahoma by the early 1910's, where much of his family still resides. I sent off late last year to the Texas Bureau of Vital Statistics to receive the death certificates of Stephen Penn Dutton, Sarah Jane Dutton, Alexander D. Dutton, and Martha Jane Dutton (Alexander's wife). Not one of them came back to me; none of them were on file. I did get a certificate for a Sarah Jane Dutton from Louisiana, but that's not really what I wanted. I had assumed that they all would have died in Texas, but more and more I'm beginning to think otherwise. What am I saying? What if they went to Oklahoma with their children? It's a likely possibility, and a very logical assumption in the first place; I don't know why it never occurred to me before. So, the night before last, I got online and surfed for information, something I haven't had time to do in a long while. To my great delight, a lot more information is coming online than was there just a short year ago. I was searching the USGenWeb FTP Archives, and I searched Oklahoma for DUTTON. Turned up a handful of hits; I didn't really expect to find anything. But I did--and what a rush. I couldn't believe what I was seeing--I nearly shouted for joy, even though it was 2 o' clock in the morning. It was a dream come true--really. I have actually dreamed about this. In the cemetery index of Love County, Oklahoma, right on the Texas border, I found the graves of Alexander and Martha Jane Dutton. No, no sign of Stephen Penn Dutton yet, but I feel that we're closer than ever before. Alexander Dutton was born 28 Dec 1823, and died 21 Jun 1904--I did not have these dates before. Martha Jane was born 1841, and died 1931. They are buried in the Leon Cemetery, at a community called Leon in Love County. Their son Dallas Dutton and his family is buried not far away in the Lakeview Cemetery. Alexander died before death certificates were instituted in Oklahoma in October 1908, but Martha, at the ripe old age of nearly 90, would surely have one. Even more importantly: if Stephen Penn Dutton was still alive after 1910, and did eventually die in Oklahoma as I suspect he did, there is a great chance that he would have one as well. It would give his date of death, place of death, and possibly place of burial. I have all the information I need to send off to for a death record search, and I'm ready to do it. But it occurred to me, with Woody and Betty being right in the middle of Oklahoma, they would have a lot easier time get a hold of them. According to the information I got online, copies of death certificates are available at the Oklahoma State Department of Health Vital Records Service. They're $10 a shot, but at least in person, ya'll, you'd have the luxury of knowing if they're on file before you have to pay. Here's the address: Vital Records Service Oklahoma State Dept. of Health 1000 Northeast Tenth, Room 117 Oklahoma City, OK 73117 (405) 271-4040 Check out these web sites for more information: http://vitalrec.com/ok.html http://www.health.state.ok.us/program/vital/dform.html Well, I've really said about all I have to say in a day. I've been at this most of the morning; I hope it doesn't take you as long to read it as it took me to write it. It's time for me to get ready for work. I hope to hear from all of you soon, Love, Cousin Joseph